I took a funeral this morning and am now having some 'reflection time'. I had considered writing the next instalment of my 'where I was at with Jesus' series but the whole subject of the riots that we have seen in the last week seems to be more in the consciousness of many of us.
My first reaction on seeing coverage of the riots on television was to think 'What has the world come to?' I even remarked to a friend who is also in Christian ministry jokingly—but only half joking: is this a sign of the end-times? I am fairly conservative in my politics and do not always have a lot of time for what could be termed 'fluffy' responses to situations like these riots. I stand completely with all those who have said that the behaviour shown was completely and utterly unacceptable in every way. This is not the behaviour that we expect from a so-called civilised society. A friend of mine posted a link to an article in the Guardian—which I wouldn't normally read—by Russell Brand. Whilst I suspect that—if we ever met—Russell and I would agree on very little, he raises a number of interesting points, and his own experience makes the article a compelling read.
Many people seem to be talking about these criminals being poor or disenfranchised from society and see some kind of explanation—for I don't think even the most liberal person would say 'justification'—for these recent events. I grew up in an area where many people come from what might be called 'marginalised' groups. It was a predominantly working-class part of Bristol with many of the problems that often go with that. I am familiar with the type of society where some people feel that they don't belong, or that they are at the margins. I am familiar with people who encounter obstacles, no matter how hard they seem to try. I know some people for whom life is full of nothing but frustration and often despair. I remember feeling some of that despair even though I had the advantage of being fairly bright. My 'escape' from that world was through education and my faith. I put the word 'escape' in inverted commas because that is how I often saw it. More recently, as I approached and now have passed my ordination, I see the past as being quite present: to some extent, somewhere inside, I still inhabit that world even if my life, at least on the outside, might suggest something different. If you walk around any working-class estate, it is interesting to have a glance at the outside of the houses, particularly the front gardens for those houses that have them. It seems to me that there are two main types. The first type are those houses that seems to be determined to make the best out of the little that they have and make an effort to keep their houses and gardens tidy. This is what I remember growing up. Now, I am not talking about the type of lawns that you see in Cambridge Colleges; I am talking about usually fairly basic areas of grass, and in some cases flowers and plants. The second type are those houses where the attitude seems to be something along the lines of 'Well, we've got f*** all, so what is the point in looking after it.' When I was growing up, it seemed that the second type was very much a minority and there was a sort of 'working-class pride'—if I can put it that way—that frowned on those houses that didn't seem to care. I have not lived in the area I grew up in for 14 years or so and so I have lost touch with life there to some extent, but it seems to me that, more and more, what we observe is the second type being the picture of working-class—or even 'benefit-class'—Britain that we are presented with. This isn't the working-class culture that I remember growing up.
Russell Brand makes two related points in his article that have struck me: 'so many people feel utterly disconnected from the cities they live in' and '[t]hese young people have no sense of community because they haven't been given one.' This hit the nail on the head for me. I am only 32 years old, but it strikes me that, even in my short 32 years, society has become more and more individualistic. People seem obsessed with what they think that they are entitled to: with their 'rights'. There is a whole generation or two—and I am, obviously, included in this—who have never known life without a National Health Service or Unemployment Benefits and other such things. It is wonderful that we have grown up with these things but I think that what has happened is that we are used to a society where we have come to expect certain things and it seems that our expectations are becoming greater and greater. There is also, surely, an extent to which we have lost a sense of boundaries. As society has become more liberal and suspicious of absolutes, we have come to question what previously has just been assumed. I think that this is also true of the limits of what we think of as unacceptable behaviour. No matter how poor we were as I was growing up, or others around me, there is no way that anybody would have said that what we have witnessed could be a justifiable response to whatever poverty of disillusionment we might be experiencing.
This growing individualisation and liberalism has, I think, led to a society in which it has become much more difficult to give people appropriate boundaries. If you called a meeting to put in place a list of 'appropriate boundaries', you can bet money that somebody would ask for a definition of the term! I don't think it is as simple as blaming parents because, at the end of the day, that merely carries on our own perverted focus and obsession on the individual. I think that the problem we have is that we have—and I recognise that this might be too much of a generalisation—lost a sense of community identity. It has been heartening to see many groups of people out on the streets clearing up, but I can't help feeling that is too little, too late. What happens when the streets have been cleaned? Surely, we will all just revert back to being a collection of individuals who just happen to be occupying the same space? I think that this is the central issue rather than poverty, and I am not convinced that it was only the poor and disenfranchised who were rioting and looting. The issue is the lack of community that we see in our society generally.
I remember that in the late '90s and early '00s, there was a lot of talk at Church about the concept of 'neighbour'. I don't really know whether this was a national thing or just what my vicar like to talk about at the time, but the idea stuck and has been popping up again. Along with this idea of 'neighbour', I also hear the words of the person who asked Our Lord, 'Who is my neighbour?' Well, we are all each other's neighbours. You, reader, are my neighbour and I yours. These 'hooligans'—because it somehow makes it easier to label—are my neighbour and I theirs. I am just as bad as anybody else at trying to exist in my little individual bubble but somehow I think that I, and we all, have to start changing that. Maybe belonging does have to come first, I don't know. Perhaps it is only then when we feel that we all belong to a community that we will feel anything like a kind of social responsibility that will look after the poor—rather than expecting that some anonymous person in a local authority office will do it for us—and will help us all to have some sense of duty to look after and take pride in our local community rather than feeling that it is somehow ok to destroy it and destroy the lives of those who have lost homes and businesses.
Lord, we lift before you our broken society and we pray for healing and reconciliation in our land, and that we might become a society where we might all feel that we belong and grow in love and respect for each other. We ask this through our Lord Jesus Christ. [Feel free to comment with 'Amen' if you'd like to join in my prayer—even if you don't agree with everything I have posted.]